How we work
Written scope first. Production second.
The operating model is deliberately suited to buyers who want clarity without adding another recurring meeting, consultant or live system dependency.
Project sequence
From project context to a clean handoff.
Send context
Describe the problem, desired outcome, scale and whether representative source material is available.
Assess fit
We identify unsupported complexity, missing evidence and obvious scope risks before accepting work.
Define scope
Suitable projects receive written deliverables, exclusions, assumptions, price and acceptance criteria.
Produce + QA
The work is completed against the agreed scope, with exceptions kept visible.
Handoff
You receive the agreed output together with relevant QA and exception information.
Why async works here
The service is designed around artefacts, not meetings.
Source files, mapping decisions, exception logs, QA checks and written acceptance criteria are stronger evidence than a good sales conversation.
A project that genuinely requires extensive live consulting may simply be outside the Aldervick model.